Helen Saulnier 
Friday, 01 July 2022
By Dr Despina Mavromati
In this the latest soccer-linked method the Appellant—represented by lawful counsel—had sent its assertion of attractiveness to the CAS by e-mail but unsuccessful to send it by courier within the granted time restrict, invoking drive majeure owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. The attractiveness was declared inadmissible by the CAS Division President. In the subsequent motion to established aside the CAS award, the SFT rejected the pressure majeure argument, thinking of that the Appellant was able to reply to a CAS submission by put up 1 day following its receipt, and that there was also the chance to file the submissions by electronic submitting. The SFT dismissed the charm recalling the incredibly restricted scope of evaluate in circumstance of non-compliance with the kind specifications and applicable time limitations. See also the judgment 4A_416/2020.
Take note: This was originally revealed on SportsLegis, a specialised sporting activities law apply run by Dr Despina Mavromati. The first can be found below.
An English translation of the judgment can be seen below.
Keep on reading through this article…
Sign up with your electronic mail and password
Now a member? Sign in
Get accessibility to all of the professional investigation and commentary at LawInSport including content, webinars, convention videos and podcast transcripts. Uncover out much more here.
Written by
Dr Despina Mavromati
Despina Mavromati is a Swiss and Greek legal professional with intensive encounter in international sports activities regulation and arbitration. She represents athletes, golf equipment and federations and advises on all regulatory and sports governance issues, together with the recognition and enforcement of awards and freezing of belongings in Switzerland. Despina has acted as counsel, co-counsel, skilled or arbitrator in more than 80 athletics arbitrations, involving contractual, governance, doping-linked and other disciplinary and ethics matters.
