Steve Bannon’s defense to begin in ex-Trump adviser’s trial

WASHINGTON (AP) — Steve Bannon’s lawyers are expected Thursday to get started their protection of the previous adviser to then-President Donald Trump as Bannon’s contempt of Congress demo enters a new section.

Bannon was in an unofficial capacity to Trump at the time of the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, and is charged with defying a congressional subpoena from the Property committee investigating the aftermath of the 2020 election and the events top up to the lethal riot.

It is unclear whether Bannon, 68, will take the stand or whom the protection could possibly phone as witnesses.

Bannon was indicted in November on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress, a thirty day period right after the Justice Office gained the Residence panel’s referral. Just about every depend carries a minimum amount of 30 times of jail and as very long as a 12 months at the rear of bars on conviction.

The Justice Division rested its scenario Wednesday immediately after calling just two witnesses: Kristin Amerling, the Property committee’s main counsel, and FBI unique agent Stephen Hart. The prosecution’s situation was dominated by testimony from Amerling, who stated the extent to which the committee tried using to have interaction Bannon and the timeline main up to the skipped deadline.

Bannon’s lawyer tried using Wednesday to create that the deadline for the onetime Trump strategist to seem before the Property committee investigating the Capitol riot was flexible as extended as the two sides had been on negotiating terms.

Bannon law firm Evan Corcoran requested Amerling whether it was popular for witnesses to look right before a congressional committee a number of weeks just after the deadline date on a subpoena. Amerling answered “yes,” but added only “when witnesses are cooperating with the committee.”

Amerling said Bannon was uncooperative from the begin, so there was no these kinds of leeway.

The committee heard absolutely nothing from Bannon till immediately after the to start with deadline had passed, at which place his law firm sent a letter to the committee stating that Bannon was protected by Trump’s assert of govt privilege and would not be delivering paperwork or showing. The committee responded in writing that Trump’s claim was invalid — Trump was no more time president, and Bannon was not utilized at the White Household at the time of the riot.

The panel gave Bannon a really hard deadline of Oct. 14 to arrive ahead of the committee. When that deadline handed, the committee chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss out on., wrote Bannon’s law firm on Oct. 15 threatening criminal prosecution.

The committee, which is keeping a primary time hearing Thursday, needed to speak with Bannon simply because it experienced facts that Bannon was actively associated in organizing, logistics and fundraising for initiatives by Trump, a Republican, to overturn the 2020 election and cease Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory. The subpoena demanded any documents or communications relating to Trump and other people in his orbit, which includes attorney Rudy Giuliani and extremist groups these types of as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers.

The emphasis on the subpoena timeline is one particular of the several avenues of protection that U.S. District Decide Carl Nichols remaining Bannon’s authorized workforce soon after a listening to past week. Nichols ruled that big elements of Bannon’s prepared protection ended up irrelevant and could not be introduced in courtroom. The decide reported Bannon could not claim he considered he was coated by government privilege, which allows presidents to withhold confidential information and facts from the courts and the legislative department, or that he was acting on the suggestions of his attorneys.

In opening statements Corcoran argued that the fees from him have been politically enthusiastic and that Bannon was engaged in excellent-religion negotiations with the congressional committee when he was charged.

“No one disregarded the subpoena,” Corcoran advised the jury.

In truth, Corcoran claimed, a person of Bannon’s earlier legal professionals, Robert Costello, contacted an legal professional for the Household committee to specific some of Bannon’s worries about testifying.

“They did what two legal professionals do. They negotiated,” Corcoran claimed, including that Bannon and his lawful crew believed “the dates of the subpoena had been not fastened they have been flexible.”


Follow AP’s coverage of the Jan. 6 committee hearings at