Helen Saulnier 
Huh.
Yesterday, St Sen Mastriano was peddling anti-vaccine BS (ordinarily Wendy Bell’s milieu) and now Wendy Bell is spreading climate science denial. What’s the earth coming to when you are unable to rely on your preferred wingnuts to stay in their very own wingnutty lanes?
Choose a glance:
Let us fall this at the altar of weather alarmism. It is a shame a number of excellent points get in the way of a silly narrative. https://t.co/Mtjwqpx4WD
— Wendy Bell (@WendyBellPgh) January 13, 2023
Wendy is quoting from Steven Milloy, a properly identified Climate Science denier. So yea let us drop a few very good information into this discussion.
This is the graphic that Milloy is employing as proof:
If you glance up in the higher correct hand corner, you are going to see this:
So he is restricting his analysis to the previous 7-8 yrs or so. Crimson flag appropriate there. So effortless to location, far too!
My guess is that he created this impression in this article – wherever you can load in the starting and ending points for the knowledge.
For illustration, if I were being to, say, go all the way back a century, this is what the graph would appear like:
By restricting the data to the past several years, Milloy is committing what is known as a “lie by omission.” He is not giving the total variety of details and so his viewers will come away with an inaccurate picture of the truth of the matter. And by retweeting it, Wendy’s collaborating in the lie.
Um, Wendy? Do you seriously want to retweet something so of course inaccurate in an endeavor to influence your viewers that something that’s not genuine is in fact correct?
Ha. I made a humorous.
Of class she would. She’s Wendy frickin’ Bell, Angel of Loss of life.
